Life is complicated.
April 2nd, 2016 by drcoplan Dr. Coplan reflects on ethics, politics, and government
The State of Indiana has just passed a law banning abortions based upon the race, gender, or possible disability status of the fetus. If you believe that all abortion is murder, you will have no problem with this bill (except, perhaps, that it does not go far enough). Otherwise, you will probably find this bill offensive, for various reasons.
You might regard fetal gender as reason that could not ethically be raised for termination of pregnancy, but life is not so simple. Many years ago, the parents of a child with severe autism approached me with a request: They wanted more children, but were afraid of having another child with autism. Since boys with autism outnumber girls by a factor of 4 to 1, they wanted to have only girls. This “girls only” strategy would seem to reduce their risk by 75%. (We know now that this logic is not exactly correct. In fact, the recurrence risk depends on the gender of the child already born with ASD, as well as the gender of fetus, in a much more complicate fashion than the simple male:female ratio of children with ASD in the overall population. You can read more here. But 20 years ago we didn’t have that information.) The parents’ request: Would I write a letter to their Ob-Gyn, laying out the rationale for fetal sexing and selective termination of male pregnancies? Read the rest of this entry »